Wikipedia's community policy currently prohibits the use of text created by artificial intelligence (AI), with only two exceptions. This view stems from concerns about the ability of AI to create biased or inaccurate information.
Previous proposals for a comprehensive guide on the use of major language models (LLM) have failed due to the sophistication and complexity in adjusting AI. According to Wikipedia administrator Chaotic Enby, a single community guide cannot fully address all issues related to LLM.
Currently, AI is allowed to be used on Wikipedia to check grammar and translate drafts, provided that the editor must confirm the final content to ensure accuracy and proficiency in both languages if using the AI tool for translation. This policy specifically applies to the English version of Wikipedia.
Why is the management of content created by AI important?
Content created by AI is raising broader concerns as technology continues to develop. Although language-based machine learning (LLM) systems, such as ChatGPT, have made significant progress, they still have difficulty creating consistent and reliable results in many different contexts. Wikipedia appreciates the careful verification process that human editors perform to maintain their high standards.
Moreover, as dependence on digital technology increases, measures to protect against misinformation become increasingly important. This is especially true when AI penetrates into many different fields, raising questions about security and abuse potential.
The relationship between AI and the power grid is another complex issue. Although AI can optimize clean energy systems and improve efficiency, it also contains risks, such as increasing energy and water consumption, leading to increased electricity and water prices for people in surrounding areas.
What measures are being taken to manage content created by AI?
Wikipedia's ban on AI-generated content is a step in the right direction in regulating the industry, as it keeps AI in the position of "a useful and time-saving tool" rather than "completely replacing human work".
As more and more people realize the serious consequences associated with the abuse of artificial intelligence, lawmakers need to pay attention to public opinion and growing concerns.
