My Mo Open 2025 has just concluded the mixed-women's doubles event with many impressions off the field: From the criteria for choosing a team, the limited format to the presence of overwhelming single-playing stars. However, amid praise for the record prize value and the excitement of the audience, the echoes of injustice for tennis players specializing in doubles are still uncertain.
First of all, it must be admitted: The new program has been a success in terms of communication. Reducing 32 teams to 16, applying "no-ad", short sets, quick tie-break series, plus a huge prize fund of 1 million USD makes the audience curious, the cash flow is strong and the appeal of television is skyrocketing. Jessica Pegula, representative of the WTA Player Council, also noted the same effectiveness.
However, from the opposite side, there are still concerns. The professional couples, who used technology as a foundation for coordination, were suddenly pushed out. The victory of Sara Errani and Andrea Vavassori - the only doubles partner to attend - as wildcard (unique) not only affirms self-worth, but is also the clearest proof that deep aspiration and understanding cannot be lost by flashiness.
Former tennis player Tim Henman, with a perfectionist perspective, called the new format "lacking respect for the main tour system". He said that if it is just a performance event, it should be clarified from the beginning and consider the time of organization so as not to collide with the main schedule. In fact, many tennis players have expressed regret over a big chance being denied - the so-called "Grand Slam" for couples - where they can compete and be recognized in terms of prize money, points and reputation.
So, can the shaking of the million-dollar award soothe that? The answer lies in the way we look at doubles. If there is no balance between commercial attraction and professional fairness, this content will continue to be considered a supplement, not a part that deserves respect.
