In the afternoon of August 21, the National Assembly discussed at the hall about the Draft Law on Housing (amended).
At the hall, delegate Ta Van Ha (Delegation of National Assembly Deputies of Da Nang City) said that land is the ownership of the entire people, the State is the representative of ownership and unified management, so when buying an apartment, the ownership of that apartment is the ownership of the buyer's assets.
According to Delegate Ha, materials cannot exist permanently, they must have a term. If the term of use of apartments is clearly stipulated (for example, 70 years, 90 years), then there will be a new segment for workers and people to access and buy.
The price now will reach the ability to pay, but currently we still consider buying an apartment as permanent, so the price is very high" - delegate Ha analyzed.
Also according to the delegate of the Da Nang City delegation, the development of regulations on limited-term apartment buildings will facilitate the renovation and repair of apartment buildings.
Because, in an apartment building, gathering hundreds of households to agree and pay money for the investor to rebuild is very difficult. Reality has specifically proven through several old apartment buildings in Hanoi.
The story is to clearly define, not just say in general that the apartment building has a term. The regulation of the term of the apartment building and ownership rights are two concepts that need to be clarified to avoid confusion" - delegate Ta Van Ha stated.
Regarding this issue, delegate Vuong Kim Anh (National Assembly Delegation of Phu Tho province) said that it is necessary to clearly affirm the principle of protecting people's legal housing ownership rights.
When people have spent legal money to buy houses, are granted certificates and fully fulfill financial obligations, the law needs to clearly and stably ensure their ownership rights.
According to Deputy Anh, it is necessary to continue to clearly state in the law the principle that the ownership of apartments of people does not end just because the apartment building has expired or must be demolished.
The term of use of the project is a matter of technique and construction safety; while the ownership of people's property is a legal issue.
Delegate Kim Anh said that these two concepts need to be clearly defined, avoiding making people understand that when the project deteriorates or expires, the ownership of the apartment is also naturally lost.
In addition, it is necessary to more specifically stipulate the rights of owners when apartment buildings have to be demolished and rebuilt.
An apartment may be degraded, must be inspected, must be demolished to ensure safety for people, but demolishing the project does not mean losing property ownership.
Therefore, it is proposed that the draft stipulate that when an apartment building is demolished, the legitimate property rights of the apartment owner must be preserved and converted into corresponding rights and interests in the process of renovating and rebuilding the apartment building.
People need to know clearly how they are arranged for accommodation during construction, and receive back their apartments after the project is completed with the corresponding area, where.
In case the designed area and apartment value change, the principle of determining the financial rights and obligations of the people must be clearly stipulated, avoiding prolonged disputes" - delegate Vuong Kim Anh said.
