The incident between musician Minh Khang and a technology driver is not just a personal conflict, it is a mirror reflecting how we behave in real life and online, where right and wrong are often pushed too far.
A mistake from the starting point, that is the uncultured behavior of a person working in the field of art.
Drinking alcohol and then cursing and threatening others, that is not a slip of the tongue, but an uncontrolled act, disrespectful to employees, in this case a technology driver.
A working employee is not worthy of being offended. Social titles or positions, no matter how high, are not allowed to stand above minimum standards of conduct.
However, after "getting sober" and enduring too many thị phi on social networks, musician Minh Khang publicly apologized.
Musician Minh Khang's apology is necessary to show the goodwill to correct mistakes of a person who has behaved unculturedly.
There is another issue, the community speaks out to protect vulnerable people, but also needs to have moderate responses.
Defending drivers is a natural reaction, "seeing unfairness, not forgiving", but from defending to "throwing stones in the council" is another matter.
Personal attacks, searching for personal information, dragging the subject's wife, children, and family into the affair.
Thus, protecting justice and fairness for technology drivers, but treating musician Minh Khang's wife and children unfairly.
The principle is very clear: whoever is wrong, that person is responsible. Their families are not the related party for the community to vent their anger.
A civilized society cannot be built with extreme emotions.
On the driver's side, the video release may stem from a need for self-protection. In many cases, it is a way to prove that they are not wrong.
But cyberspace is not a place where you can post anything you want.
The dissemination of images and voices of others may be related to privacy, personal data, and even violate the law if not handled properly.
There are many ways to protect rights such as reporting to authorities, providing evidence in accordance with procedures. Efficiency may be slower, but more legally safe and standardized.
Three lessons can be learned from this incident, which is to act in a controlled manner and respect others.
Two is not to turn yourself into a "crowd court" in cyberspace.
Finally, in dispute resolution, know how to protect yourself but must be in accordance with the law.
Behavior outside society or in cyberspace, compliance with the law is the root of civilization.
