In the tense developments of sports matches, especially football, an impromptu moment can erupt excitement, but at the same time it can be the opposite reaction. A player in Brazil has just been shown a yellow card for stepping on the ball with both feet in front of an opposing player.
The moment is very short, about 1 second, but enough to become a "need to be studied" issue. And once studied, it must revolve around a series of questions, to see what and which boundaries should and should not be crossed.
First of all, it is necessary to understand that improvisation often arises when people are placed in a relatively emotionally free state, breaking out of the mold. The problem is that there is no emotional unity with the recipients, from opponents, referees to audiences. improvisation cannot be regular and also needs context. But no matter what, improvisation is always between the lines of creative action, so protection or provocation needs to be warned.
For example, for the above player, what does the referee's penalty card mean? The law does not prohibit standing on the ball. But the law allows referees to intervene when they feel that the behavior lacks sportsmanship. The feeling here is subjective in a very objective context. Not only officiating the match, they also have to maintain emotional order on the field, so it is also difficult to blame them if they take a card. When a move risks triggering anger from the opponent, warning is a way to put out the fire early.
But if the opponent gets angry, who is really at fault, the player who performs it or the person who cannot accept being "tortured"? High-level sports appreciate the ability to control emotions, but punish people who accidentally touch the ego of others many times.
Sports and life both need rules, but there are still moments that go beyond rules. The important thing is how people perceive and react. Creativity brings emotion and novelty. If creativity is strangled by fear of misunderstanding, the game will be safer. And when not creating, it's all just "working machines".
In the end, improvisation needs to be thought of in the direction of something that helps things sublimate, opens up new possibilities, does not hurt anyone, should not be something that puts the ego higher than the collective, or intentionally ignites emotions.
