On December 1, a source from Lao Dong Newspaper reported that Ms. Le Thi Hong Phuong - Chief Inspector of Go Cong Dong District (Tien Giang Province) - signed the conclusion of the inspection of compliance with the law on construction investment management, implementation of the law on receiving citizens, handling complaints and denunciations, and preventing and combating corruption at the People's Committee of Tan Phuoc Commune.
According to this inspection conclusion, during the process of checking the bidding documents of Group 3, Hamlet 6 road of Le Hoang Quan Company and the capacity profile of Ky Anh Construction Company Limited. The inspection team checked and discovered 40 certification documents that were not in accordance with regulations.
In addition, at the time of project management consulting and supervision consulting for the following projects: Road Group 1, 2, 3, Hamlet 5; Road Group 3, Hamlet 4; Road Group 8 No. 1, Hamlet 5; Hamlet 5 Headquarters, Ky Anh Construction Company Limited did not have the qualifications and capacity to perform supervision consulting for the above 4 projects according to regulations.
Regarding the case of forgery and use of fake documents in bidding documents, on August 29, 2024, the inspection team verified and worked with Mr. Tran Van Au - Director of Le Hoang Quan Company and Mr. Tran Ba Nhi (Mr. Au's son) who admitted to forging and using these fake documents to prove the qualifications in the bidding documents of Le Hoang Quan Company for package No. 2: Construction and installation of road project of Group 3, Hamlet 6.
11 fake documents include: Bid security No. 516/BIDV.TG-QTTD; Credit commitment document No. 138/BIDV.TG-PGD GC dated June 26, 2023 of Vietnam Joint Stock Commercial Bank for Investment and Development - Tien Giang Branch; Official dispatch No. 05/CV-Cty.LUN on confirming the scale and personnel of the road project of Group 4, Group 5, Hamlet 4...
The inspector pointed out the limitations and shortcomings of the People's Committee of Tan Phuoc commune because it paid a difference of more than 105 million VND, causing damage and loss to the state budget of more than 105 million VND for the roofing project of Tan Phuoc market, To 3 street, Hamlet 6, and Bay Tre street.
From the above violations, limitations and shortcomings, the Chief Inspector of Go Cong Dong district recommends that the Chairman of the People's Committee of Go Cong Dong district direct the specialized agency with the function of advising the People's Committee of the district in the field of bidding, handling organizations and individuals with violations in organizing the selection of contractors and evaluating bidding documents and proposal documents for package No. 2, construction and installation, road project of Group 3, Hamlet 6 according to regulations.