Taking the incident related to Dinh Bac's collision in the match between Truong Tuoi Dong Nai and Cong An Hanoi as an example. It is not surprising that the accompanying consequence is a series of criticisms, criticisms, evaluations, and comments. Then even "letters" appeared to advise: Should be this way, need that way...
But be careful. Rushing too enthusiastically into arguments can get you lost in the trap that you contribute to creating - the trap of psychology, ethics, law, or any perspective mentioned.
Why can't people stop at the framework of the matter, that, making a mistake is making a mistake, punishing is punishing, losing is losing? It always has to lead to one (and many) other things, sometimes it's not much of a concern. Why keep looking for answers from a psychological or moral nature perspective, even though they themselves are not involved?
Public opinion questions whether Dinh Bac is provocative or not, whether the opponent loses control or not, and then hastily answers himself through assessing the personality and character of a person. But is it certain that the "ball dance" is the cause, when the matter may start from some other reason outside the field?
It's like a child breaking a cup, but adults dragging along a story of clumsiness and recklessness to criticize, even though they don't know the cause. And the last important thing is why get angry, but there is no positive result, only accumulating more annoyance and burden from prejudice from themselves.
Saying that does not mean being silent about everything. Life always needs concern about issues worth discussing, worth contemplating to analyze and find solutions that bring value. But with collisions on the pitch, sometimes it is simply a violation of the rules of the game under high pressure. From there, delineate the handling area with legal tools and professional sanctions, instead of importantly turning it into a moral story - where everyone suddenly becomes a "specialist".
Life is inherently full of complexities, making people tired. Less thinking, knowing how to stop, less reasoning, knowing how to avoid useless arguments and focusing energy on other things.
